617 Piraeus (403 BC)

More
12 years 1 month ago - 12 years 1 month ago #1327 by alecrespi
** This thread discusses the Content article: **
Last edit: 12 years 1 month ago by Alessandro Crespi.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 9 months ago #2603 by mk20336
Replied by mk20336 on topic 617 Piraeus (403 BC)


Played recently with stormwalker as part of Spartan Hegemony campaign (10 scenarios, so far 5 played).
Again, bold maneuver of attacking downhill payed off, although in the end I had to fend-off some Spartans who managed to climb the hills.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
3 years 6 months ago #3627 by Lastall
Replied by Lastall on topic 617 Piraeus (403 BC)
This was actually an interesting battle. The Athenians have enough in the center to hold the hills until mid/late game. After that, I scattered them so the Spartans would have to spread their army to catch me. My Athenian army has speed to out maneuver the med foot troops. Even after a weak opening hand (two move heavy cards included), I was able to pull a 6/5 victory. I never used a command card on the Athenian med troops. Tomorrow I play as Spartans.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 months 1 week ago #39692 by Riclev
Replied by Riclev on topic 617 Piraeus (403 BC)
At a first glance, one could be forgiven for thinking that the Spartans should win the majority of the time as they have the stronger army. But the Athenian position on the hill compensates. In our game, the Spartans won 6-5, but it took a long time as we went through the deck and had to reshuffle. Moreover, the Athenians could have taken it 6-4 if they had rolled better. This is a tense scenario and well worth playing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.660 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum