115 Albuera (16 May 1811)

More
12 years 2 months ago #641 by alecrespi

Alessandro - Website Admin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 1 month ago #1326 by Mark-McG
Replied by Mark-McG on topic 115 Albuera (16 May 1811)
this scenario should be tagged 'unbalanced' based on the 81% French victory results record

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
[img][/img]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 1 month ago #1329 by alecrespi
Replied by alecrespi on topic 115 Albuera (16 May 1811)
GOTCHA.
Just fixed it.
Thank you
Ale

Alessandro - Website Admin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 10 months ago #1614 by Nimitstexan
The way I read it, the French only get a single flag for the town, even if they manage to occupy both town hexes at the same time, correct?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 10 months ago #1615 by Bayernkini
I agree with you, and we played it so far this way.
Nevertheless we will check the rules by a request to GMT ;)

My dice are the hell!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 months ago #4374 by Tarheel
Replied by Tarheel on topic 115 Albuera (16 May 1811)
so, how are rules changed with tactician dck? Does the Folley rule apply to cards similar to FS? For example, charge if charged, infantry melee first, etc?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 months ago #4375 by Tarheel
Replied by Tarheel on topic 115 Albuera (16 May 1811)
first turn cav charge is nasty

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 months ago #4376 by Bayernkini

so, how are rules changed with tactician dck? Does the Folley rule apply to cards similar to FS? For example, charge if charged, infantry melee first, etc?


Nothing changed in the scenario rules. All rules apply exact as written with the Tactician Deck too.

My dice are the hell!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 months ago #4377 by Tarheel
Replied by Tarheel on topic 115 Albuera (16 May 1811)
Of course this applies to the first strike card in the tactician deck, but if we are literal, then exactly as written would mean the Folly special rule would not exclude play of a charge if charged, infantry melee first, etc. is that what you are saying? The spirit of the rule would seem to not allow these cards eiher.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
7 years 3 months ago #4378 by Bayernkini
I see the circumstances with other similar FS cards in the TC deck.
For simplicity i would say/prefer, the rules remain exact as written.

But maybe the Richard see this also different and i add his answer soon here :)

My dice are the hell!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 1.133 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum