Short Supply: A less gamy house rule

4 years 8 months ago #4405 by steelcamp
The house rule we have currently. When the short supply Tac card is played: The unit retreats 3 hexes following normal retreat rules with the following exceptions. If a unit reaches the board edge before 3 hexes it stops but does not incur loses for not being able to retreat the full 3 hexes, units can retreat through through friendly units to meet the three hex requirement. Guards have the option of retreating only 2 hexes. Only Infantry and Artillery units can be subjected to the cards influence.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

4 years 8 months ago #4406 by Mark-McG
I think there are 2 distinct issues that are getting confused;

1. The teleport back to the base line.
2. The fact that Short Supply has transformed from a (lame) Command card to a Tactic Card that can be taken immediate advantage of by ordered enemy units.

The distinction between retreat 3 hexes and moving back to the base line is immaterial in my view, and really I have no issue with the whole short supply teleport move.

The immediate advantage gained by a well timed short supply is more problematic in my view, and I have used it to grab important objective hexes by short supplying the defenders and then moving in. In my view, the fix here is to make Short Supply be played at the end of the turn, rather than the start.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

4 years 7 months ago #4434 by Bolkonsky
I think Mark's clarification of those two issues is really helpful. Personally, i think there is a 3rd relevant issue, which is how well the card is able to simulate what should be an unpredictable event.

I agree that how far a unit is moved is not the critical factor.

At first I thought that the suggestion of playing the card at the end of the turn instead of the beginning was a good solution and I do think it might improve the situation. But, there remains a problem, in that a player may still exploit the card in a way that feels very artificial. Knowing that they hold the card to play at the end of the turn, a player might order a unit to make a sacrificial attack, then 'teleport' the unit to safety. Probably better than the other way round, but still very gamey.

A further suggestion, which might also address my issue 3, would be to make the card a play instantly. Since there are occasions when both players collect Tactics cards at the end of the turn, whether it was effectively played at the beginning or the end of the turn would depend on who picked it up (although it would be mainly the end). With the remainder of the card unchanged, this would still clearly allow both forms of exploitation of the card mentioned BUT it would be impossible to plan for it. Yes, someone would get an advantage, but it would be much closer to being a random event and, to my mind, much more exciting!

[Obviously, it could also appear in a starting hand, in which case why not simply play it before the first turn - a unit simply isn't where it should have been - lost en route, wrong orders...]

If everyone made war only according to his own convictions, there would be no war.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.668 seconds

Forum Statistics

  • Total Users:907
  • Latest
  • Total Posts:7376
  • Total Topics:829
  • Total Sections:2
  • Total Categories:14
  • Today Open:0
  • Yesterday Open:0
  • Today Answer:1
  • Yesterday Answer:0

Top Posters

Top Posters Posts
Bayernkini 1118
Mark-McG 1026
Tarheel 263
GG 191
TheMP 175

Top Thanks

Top Thanks Thanks
Bayernkini 319
Mark-McG 98
GG 18
Grambo589 14
Grondeaux 13

Random Quote

There are in Europe many good generals, but they see too many things at once. I see one thing, namely the enemy's main body. I try to crush it, confident that secondary matters will then settle themselves. ~Napoleon