ancients  battlecry  napoleonics  samuraibattles  thegreatwar   tricorne  medieval Support Us

218 River Stour (54 BC)

More
10 years 3 months ago #70 by admin
** This thread discusses the Content article: 218 River Stour (54 BC) **

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
8 years 4 months ago #814 by King-Billy
Replied by King-Billy on topic 218 River Stour (54 BC)
Watched my son (Daniel, Britons) play this yesterday. He and his opponent (Peter, Romans) picked it because of the unusual nature of the British forces.

The early battle saw the British chariots thrashing the Roman light infantry. Pete got a bit of a rush of blood and lost a medium calvalry unit in a premature attack.

The PBI (poor bloody infantry) of the Romans had to slog forward, with the Britons evading every attack they could, but being pushed back towards the board edge.

The game changed when Ceasar, with a medium infantry unit, seperated from the battle line. Three chariot units attacked it, hoping to wipe out Ceasar. This was not to be. Ceasar urged his men forward, and with the benefit of an additional die to battle back attacks, wiped out the the chariots, taking loses as he did so, but coming out victorious.

Definately a game of two halves. The Romans just have to suck up the damage as his infantry advance, but then go in for the kill when the Chariots can evade no further.

Romans 6, Britons 5.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 1 month ago #2147 by TomKnight3
Replied by TomKnight3 on topic 218 River Stour (54 BC)
The British chariots slammed full-steam into the Romans. At first it looked like the British were doomed. The Romans hit back cracking most of the British units. However, after learning how to do hit and run tatics, the British did better. The Romans had no line command or leadership cards and could never move forward in order. The Romans charged their calvary too soon, losing them. The Brits won 6/5 in a turn around game.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 1 month ago #2154 by TomKnight3
Replied by TomKnight3 on topic 218 River Stour (54 BC)
In this rematch, I was now the Brits. I got a mounted charge early in the game (the whole game was just 7 turns) and hit the Roman left. I was able to do some fair damage though lost a unit of chariot. However, the Roman general on that side had to retreat to a calvary unit. One my next turn I was able to surround him and crush his unit, and him. I was then up 4/2. On my next turn I hit the Roman right and was able to pick off an archer and one more in the the Roman left. The game ended 6/2, making up my lost as Caesar several days before.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 months 3 weeks ago #2199 by TomKnight3
Replied by TomKnight3 on topic 218 River Stour (54 BC)
I played two games today. Not good. Lost both, once as the Romans and then as the Brits. I want to rematch for sure.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 months 1 week ago #2249 by g1ul10
Replied by g1ul10 on topic 218 River Stour (54 BC)
Britons: 6 Romans: 2
The chariots hit and run strategy proved devastating for the Roman troops. The scenario was over before Caesar was able to engage the chariots laying in the bottom of the map.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 months 1 week ago #2634 by barmyfongyphipps
The Britons attacked strongly on the right, and managed to turn the Roman left flank, leaving the Caesar unit swinging at thin air as it advanced boldly to meet the barbarians head-on. Playing Move-Fire-Move, the chariots then swung in behind deep across the Roman rear. Caesar and neighbouring infantry - too far advanced to help - could only watch the ensuing disaster unfold. Playing Mounted Charge, the Britons sandwiched the Roman centre-right against leader-led chariots from behind and chariots and cavalry from front in the centre-left sections. Some Romans made it to the safety of nearby woods, but many others were killed, surrounded on all sides. Only 14 cards played and the Britons won handsomely, 6-3.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Freeloading-Phill
Time to create page: 0.279 seconds

Forum Statistics

  • Total Users:799
  • Latest Member:dans221
  • Total Posts:2641
  • Total Topics:744
  • Total Sections:2
  • Total Categories:36
  • Today Open:0
  • Yesterday Open:0
  • Today Answer:0
  • Yesterday Answer:1

Top Posters

Top Posters Posts
Mark-McG 246
mk20336 169
alecrespi 98
admin 97
g1ul10 90

Top Thanks

Top Thanks Thanks
Mark-McG 14
alecrespi 9
mk20336 7
g1ul10 4
plainscape 2

This site uses cookies to improve your experience.