ancients  battlecry  napoleonics  samuraibattles  thegreatwar Support Us 

210 Picenum (72 BC)

  • Alessandro Crespi
  • Alessandro Crespi's Avatar Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
9 years 3 months ago #62 by Alessandro Crespi
Alessandro Crespi created the topic: 210 Picenum (72 BC)
** This thread discusses the Content article: 210 Picenum (72 BC) **

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 months 2 weeks ago #2104 by Valvorik
Valvorik replied the topic: 210 Picenum (72 BC)
10 turn solo game, Romans 8:4. No shattering moves, just steady work, Marian unit fire, heavy fire couple of times to take a block out of warrior unit early etc.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 months 2 weeks ago #2105 by Valvorik
Valvorik replied the topic: 210 Picenum (72 BC)
Played again, 14 turns, Slaves 8:3. The Romans were really hindered by their divided command more than anything else, weakening their hand's effectiveness.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Freeloading-Phill
Time to create page: 1.588 seconds

Forum Statistics

  • Total Users:747
  • Latest Member:Pars
  • Total Posts:2135
  • Total Topics:671
  • Total Sections:2
  • Total Categories:36
  • Today Open:0
  • Yesterday Open:0
  • Today Answer:1
  • Yesterday Answer:0

Top Posters

Top Posters Posts
Mark-McG 161
mk20336 104
admin 96
The-Admiral 83
Achtung-Panzer 75

Top Thanks

Top Thanks Thanks
Mark-McG 11
mk20336 7
g1ul10 4
alecrespi 3
plainscape 2

This site uses cookies to improve your experience.