ancients  battlecry  napoleonics  samuraibattles  thegreatwar    tricorne  redalert  medieval Support Us

210 Picenum (72 BC)

  • Alessandro Crespi
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
11 years 2 months ago #62 by Alessandro Crespi
210 Picenum (72 BC) was created by Alessandro Crespi
** This thread discusses the Content article: 210 Picenum (72 BC) **

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 1 month ago #2104 by Valvorik
Replied by Valvorik on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
10 turn solo game, Romans 8:4. No shattering moves, just steady work, Marian unit fire, heavy fire couple of times to take a block out of warrior unit early etc.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 1 month ago #2105 by Valvorik
Replied by Valvorik on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
Played again, 14 turns, Slaves 8:3. The Romans were really hindered by their divided command more than anything else, weakening their hand's effectiveness.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 2 months ago #2565 by driddle01
Replied by driddle01 on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
Slaves won 8:5. Romans did okay on right, but slaves rolled Roman right, and Spartacus started to roll the right side of Roman left army.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Freeloading-Phill
Time to create page: 0.435 seconds

Forum Statistics

  • Total Users:872
  • Latest Member:epos68
  • Total Posts:3074
  • Total Topics:813
  • Total Sections:2
  • Total Categories:36
  • Today Open:0
  • Yesterday Open:0
  • Today Answer:0
  • Yesterday Answer:0

Top Posters

Top Posters Posts
Mark-McG 297
mk20336 190
alecrespi 125
g1ul10 121
admin 97

Top Thanks

Top Thanks Thanks
Mark-McG 14
alecrespi 11
g1ul10 10
mk20336 9
t.gracchus 5

This site uses cookies to improve your experience.