210 Picenum (72 BC)

More
18 years 1 month ago #62 by alecrespi
** This thread discusses the Content article: 210 Picenum (72 BC) **

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 1 week ago #2104 by Valvorik
Replied by Valvorik on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
10 turn solo game, Romans 8:4. No shattering moves, just steady work, Marian unit fire, heavy fire couple of times to take a block out of warrior unit early etc.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 1 week ago #2105 by Valvorik
Replied by Valvorik on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
Played again, 14 turns, Slaves 8:3. The Romans were really hindered by their divided command more than anything else, weakening their hand's effectiveness.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
8 years 1 month ago #2565 by driddle01
Replied by driddle01 on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
Slaves won 8:5. Romans did okay on right, but slaves rolled Roman right, and Spartacus started to roll the right side of Roman left army.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
5 years 2 weeks ago - 5 years 2 weeks ago #3982 by fmpape
Replied by fmpape on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
Slaves won 8:2.
The Romans suffered badly from an inability coordinate their forces.
Much of the battle took place down the central hills.
Spartacus' army fought like true gladiators pretty much coming out on top in every close combat with the Romans.
Most Roman units were lost within 1 or 2 close combats.
Last edit: 5 years 2 weeks ago by fmpape.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
4 years 3 months ago #4235 by clavain
Replied by clavain on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
8-3 Slaves. Slave right skirmished and then committed with slowly advancing Romans, and both Slave right and Roman left more or less knocked each other out. Spartacus then had two line commands followed by an I am Spartacus to come crashing down on the Roman right/center. Didn't help that the Romans rolled poorly but the wing coordination really hurt them also. Didn't help that two Roman leaders also died to one slave leader.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
3 months 2 weeks ago #199892 by clavain
Replied by clavain on topic 210 Picenum (72 BC)
8-6 slaves. Very slow Roman advance on both wings, Roman horse moved up the centre hill line to fill the gap. Slaves eventually came down off the hills, first into the Roman right which was countered by two Medium horse doing a Mounted Charge, then slaves used I am Spartacus and came down on the Roman left, eventually pulling out the win

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Freeloading-Phill
Time to create page: 0.483 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum